CatallaxCore
← Back to bills

SB 17-186

failed

Reduce Regulatory Burden Rules On Businesses

Plain-English Summary

AI-generated

Senate Bill 17-186 aims to ease regulatory burdens on small businesses in Colorado by adjusting how "small business" is defined under state law. The bill broadens the definition of a small business to include entities with fewer than 500 employees or less than $6 million in annual sales, and it requires government agencies to consider less stringent regulations when creating new rules that could affect these businesses. It also mandates that agencies consult with small business representatives during rule-making processes and provides resources for small businesses to access regulatory analyses online. The bill has been signed into law, meaning its provisions are now enforceable and will impact how state agencies interact with and regulate small businesses in Colorado.

Official Summary

The 'State Administrative Procedure Act' (APA) currently defines a small business as a business with fewer than 500 employees. The bill redefines 'small business', for purposes of the APA, to mean a business entity, including its affiliates, that: Is independently owned and operated and employs fewer than 500 employees; or Has gross annual sales of less than $6 million. Prior to adopting rules, an agency is required to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis in which the agency considers using regulatory methods that will accomplish the objectives of applicable statutes while minimizing the adverse impact on small businesses. For purposes of the regulatory flexibility analysis, the bill defines 'small business' as a business that is independently owned and operated and employs 100 or fewer employees. When preparing the regulatory flexibility analysis, the agency shall consider methods to reduce the impact on small businesses, such as: Establishing less stringent compliance or reporting requirements; Establishing less stringent schedules or deadlines for compliance or reporting; Consolidating or simplifying compliance or reporting requirements; Establishing different performance standards; and Exemptions for small businesses. The agency shall also: Determine the necessity for the proposed rules; Identify the fiscal impact of the rules; Identify and analyze the least costly alternatives to the rules and adopt the least costly alternatives unless the agency provides written justification for adopting a more costly regulatory approach; and Analyze whether small businesses should be exempted from the rules or whether less burdensome rules should be applied to small businesses and adopt exemptions or less burdensome rules, unless the agency provides written justification for a more burdensome regulatory approach. The agency shall file the regulatory flexibility analysis with the secretary of state for publication in the Colorado register at the same time that it files its notice of proposed rule-making and the draft of proposed rules. The existing provision in the APA on forming representative groups to give input on proposed rules is amended to require any state agency (agency) proposing rules that are likely to have an impact on small businesses to expand outreach to and actively solicit representatives of small businesses to participate in the representative group and in the rule-making hearing for the rules. The agency must make good faith efforts to expand outreach and notification to small businesses that lack a trade association or lobbyist to represent the types of small businesses impacted by the proposed rules. The executive director of the department of regulatory agencies, or his or her designee, shall develop a one-stop location on the department's website that provides a place for small businesses and the public to access the regulatory flexibility analyses that are prepared by state agencies. A small business that is adversely affected or aggrieved by the failure of the agency to comply with the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements may file a request with the executive director of the department of regulatory agencies to require the agency to prepare a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed rules and to direct the agency to adjust the rule-making schedule to allow for the preparation of the cost-benefit analysis. For the 2017-18 fiscal year, the bill appropriates the following money for the implementation of the bill: $323,886 to the department of revenue; $102,664 to the department of public health and environment; $86,926 to the department of regulatory agencies; $8,240 to the department of state.(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)

Details

Chamber
Senate
First action
2017-04-27
Latest action
2017-02-14
Last action desc.
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
OpenStates
View source ↗

Votes

Refer Senate Bill 17-186 to the Committee on Finance. The motion passed on a vote of 6-1.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 6 · No: 1 · Other:
Refer Senate Bill 17-186, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole. The motion passed on a vote of 4-3.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 4 · No: 3 · Other:
Refer Senate Bill 17-186, as amended, to the Committee on Finance. The motion failed on a vote of 6-7.
2017-04-27 · House · failYes: 6 · No: 7 · Other:
Refer Senate Bill 17-186 to the Committee on Appropriations. The motion passed on a vote of 3-2.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 3 · No: 2 · Other:
Adopt amendment J.001 The motion passed without objection.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 0 · No: 0 · Other:
Adopt amendment L.001. The motion passed without objection.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 0 · No: 0 · Other:
Postpone Senate Bill 17-186 indefinitely. The motion passed on a vote of 7-6.
2017-04-27 · House · passYes: 7 · No: 6 · Other: